Sponsored

Promised range of 500 miles ?

cybercricket

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
659
Reaction score
798
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
You can bring an extra battery or generator, too. I wouldn't want to carry another ten gallons of gas, either.

-Crissa
While that is theoretically true, with BEVs we run into practical issues that make such approach unrealistic. First of all, extra battery would add very limited range while also adding weight, and that is even before the fact we don't have such options besides the Tesla's extender (once it becomes available). A generator could extend the range indefinitely, but at a significant time/weight penalty: I have an 11kW diesel gen that weighs 600lb (dry) and would take half of the bed space. At 11kW you require ~10 hours for adding as little as 90-100mi (towing).

So yeah, I'm down for shooting nonsense just like other people, but it gets old really fast.
 

YDR37

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 29, 2023
Threads
26
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
2,401
Location
California
Vehicles
Tacoma
Country flag
You can bring an extra battery ...
Two 5-gallon jerry cans of gasoline are a lot cheaper and more compact than a $16,000 Range Extender that takes up one-third of your bed. And the Range Extender doesn't even exist as yet, while the jerry can option has been viable for 80+ years.
or generator, too. I wouldn't want to carry another ten gallons of gas, either.
How many gallons of gas/diesel do you need to carry to power the generator?
 

dalton108

Well-known member
First Name
Dalton
Joined
Oct 17, 2020
Threads
132
Messages
3,975
Reaction score
7,919
Location
USA
Vehicles
‘24 FS/CB; ‘24 MX; ‘23 MS PLAID (Prior: ‘20-MY; ‘21-M3P) (Also: ‘14-FJ; ‘21-C8)
Occupation
Lawyer
Country flag
He is a smart technical person who doesn't actually care what an average American thinks. If you don't understand product design, iterative development, production ramps and other funzies, it's not Elon's fault. Anyone who is upset is free to take their money elsewhere.
So, I understand the point I just don’t think it applies to the CT unveiling. Was it illegally binding promise? No! Absolutely not! Was it a, “promise?” Of course it was! In any world where words in English mean what they mean, yes!

This is as much about context as it is anything else! Assertions made during battery day or AI day (the first round of each of these) are clearly what you guys are trying to suggest is what’s happening with this product unveil: statements about aspirational goals here is what we’re looking at this is where we headed in the future. That isn’t how this was couched. At all!

You’d have to be a complete dolt to think that this unveil was similar to those events. It wasn’t under any circumstances the same. You only need to look at the couched language that Elon used during those events versus his approach during the unveil. I just don’t know why you guys want to waste time arguing something so obviously false.


Dumbification of America is a concern beyond just Tesla's product lineup.
You’ll get no argument from me about this. It’s the biggest threat to our nation right now.
 
Last edited:

Crissa

Well-known member
First Name
Crissa
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Threads
138
Messages
19,571
Reaction score
31,475
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
2014 Zero S, 2013 Mazda 3
Country flag
While that is theoretically true, with BEVs we run into practical issues that make such approach unrealistic. First of all, extra battery would add very limited range while also adding weight, and that is even before the fact we don't have such options besides the Tesla's extender (once it becomes available). A generator could extend the range indefinitely, but at a significant time/weight penalty.
...But there's charging stations, so you don't need to do that.

Two 5-gallon jerry cans of gasoline are a lot cheaper and more compact than a
Good thing that ICE vehicles didn't evaporate the moment EVs excelled at everything but this one thing almost no one does.

-Crissa
 


cybercricket

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
659
Reaction score
798
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
So, I understand the point I just don’t think it applies to the CT unveiling. Was it illegally binding promise? No! Absolutely not! Was it a, “promise?” Of course it was! In any world where words in English mean what they mean, yes!

This is as much about context as it is anything else! Assertion’s made during during battery day or AI day the first round of each of these are clearly what you guys are trying to suggest what’s happening with the product unveil. Statements about aspirational goals here is what we’re looking at this is where we headed in the future.

You’d have to be a complete dolt to think that this unveil was similar to those events. It wasn’t under any circumstances the same. You only need to look at the couch language that Elon used during those events versus his approach during the unveil. I just don’t know why you guys want to waste time arguing something so obviously false.

You’ll get no argument from me about this. It’s the biggest threat to our nation right now.
Okay, so I don't know what else I can add to that other than perhaps the need for people to look at the track record of Elon's companies. They consistently make product roadmap announcements that in practice materialize in different ways. I understand why that is the case, and see it as a reasonable tradeoff to having no cutting edge products, but there is just no way to have it both ways - doing things fast and also hitting every bullet point from 5 years prior.
 

dalton108

Well-known member
First Name
Dalton
Joined
Oct 17, 2020
Threads
132
Messages
3,975
Reaction score
7,919
Location
USA
Vehicles
‘24 FS/CB; ‘24 MX; ‘23 MS PLAID (Prior: ‘20-MY; ‘21-M3P) (Also: ‘14-FJ; ‘21-C8)
Occupation
Lawyer
Country flag
Okay, so I don't know what else I can add to that other than perhaps the need for people to look at the track record of Elon's companies. They consistently make product roadmap announcements that in practice materialize in different ways. I understand why that is the case, and see it as a reasonable tradeoff to having no cutting edge products, but there is just no way to have it both ways - doing things fast and also hitting every bullet point from 5 years prior.
Yes but you make it sound like Tesla anticipated that the vehicle was going to take five years to develop. Elon didn’t anticipate Covid. Lots of things happened in between the reveal to launch. Thank you for getting the timeline and how it happened - this was not a preview, it was an unveil.

Again, I need to be clear I’m not “whining” about it not having 500 miles I still bought the damn truck. I’m objecting to trying to police people’s use of the word “promise” when it is literally the exact right word in English to describe what was made.

I don’t understand why people are acting like acknowledging that fact is some kind of crime against humanity.

I also reject categorically any suggestion from anyone that 500 miles isn’t necessary. In an EV that is designed for off-road and towing?- Yes, it is!
 

Crissa

Well-known member
First Name
Crissa
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Threads
138
Messages
19,571
Reaction score
31,475
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
2014 Zero S, 2013 Mazda 3
Country flag
Okay, so I don't know what else I can add to that other than perhaps the need for people to look at the track record of Elon's companies. They consistently make product roadmap announcements that in practice materialize in different ways. I understand why that is the case, and see it as a reasonable tradeoff to having no cutting edge products, but there is just no way to have it both ways - doing things fast and also hitting every bullet point from 5 years prior.
Exactly.

The Cybertruck has only been out a year. And the single motor hasn't been canceled or delivered yet!

Maybe they'll end up with a glut of batteries they need to sell after the new administration cuts the incentives. (Yeah, I know, unlikely.)

-Crissa
 


cybercricket

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
659
Reaction score
798
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
Yes but you make it sound like Tesla anticipated that the vehicle was going to take five years to develop.
They definitely anticipated that it will be a difficult vehicle to produce. That was stated repeatedly, and they knew it from experience - both Model 3 ramp and Semi development were the references.

Elon didn’t anticipate Covid. Lots of things happened in between the reveal to launch. Thank you for getting the timeline and how it happened - this was not a preview, it was an unveil.
Preview, unveil or any other word is meaningless. One could compare to other car manufacturers, but Tesla doesn't use traditional automotive constructs pretty much anywhere in their business model, why would this be an exception ? The reality is the vehicle demonstrated was a hand built advanced prototype. It was effectively a message to investors "look what we're up to." They had no final specs, no manufacturing techniques, and definitely no production lines for it until years later, and all of that was communicated the entire time - nobody was kept in the dark.

Again, I need to be clear I’m not “whining” about it not having 500 miles I still bought the damn truck. I’m objecting to trying to police people’s use of the word “promise” when it is literally the exact right word in English to describe what was made.
I've noticed your occupation in the profile. Are you saying you or your colleagues never bend into a pretzel to get the words mean whatever you need them to mean ? :D

I don’t understand why people are acting like acknowledging that fact is some kind of crime against humanity.
It is just annoying since we've been over this hundreds of times already. People are annoyed and they are voicing their annoyance.

I also reject categorically any suggestion from anyone that 500 miles isn’t necessary. In an EV that is designed for off-road and towing?- Yes, it is!
Elon commented on this topic a few years ago. He rejected the notion bigger batteries are needed in favor of better charging infrastructure. I would also add that you don't need 500mi EPA range for off-roading - at lower speeds you travel significantly farther on a charge than on-road at highway speeds. Towing is also disputable once there is a significant critical mass of pull-through charging stations.
 

dalton108

Well-known member
First Name
Dalton
Joined
Oct 17, 2020
Threads
132
Messages
3,975
Reaction score
7,919
Location
USA
Vehicles
‘24 FS/CB; ‘24 MX; ‘23 MS PLAID (Prior: ‘20-MY; ‘21-M3P) (Also: ‘14-FJ; ‘21-C8)
Occupation
Lawyer
Country flag
I would also add that you don't need 500mi EPA range for off-roading - at lower speeds you travel significantly farther on a charge than on-road at highway speeds. Towing is also disputable once there is a significant critical mass of pull-through charging stations.
Yeah but I do. Whether I’m towing my travel trailer or not I first have to get to the wilderness area that I’m trying to get to. I’m in the west that isn’t going to be close. Most of the places that I want to be in are one to 200 miles from my starting point then I need juice for overnight for as many nights as I want to be there and over landing once I get there. So no 50 miles of range remaining isn’t going to cut it.

Again there are places in my own state that I cannot get to and back from with my Cybertruck even ABRP cannot plot a path because the infrastructure doesn’t exist.

There are millions of people that are similar to situated in my city I see them in their jeeps and other rigs and if I want to join them I’m going to have to get into my FJ because I can’t do it in my CB.

You guys can minimize it all you want to, it will never stop being a problem until it’s fixed. I can have as many cars as I want for as many purposes as I want.

Most people are not similarly situated and they will have to choose. Some will have to not choose a Cybertruck because it won’t work for them in very normal use cases.

I happen to think that that’s not ideal. It is what it is.

Also, Elon and RJ both rejected that notion after they realized that they couldn’t deliver on it. Again I’m not taking the counsel and advice of men who want to tell me that I don’t need 500 miles because they’ve got a 300 mile car that they want to sell me today. I know what their interests are and I have the good fortune of knowing precisely what I actually need.
 
Last edited:

cybercricket

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
659
Reaction score
798
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
Also, Elon and RJ both rejected that notion after they realized that they couldn’t deliver on it. Again I’m not taking the counsel and advice of men who want to tell me that I don’t need 500 miles because they’ve got a 300 mile car that they want to sell me today. I know what their interests are and I have the good fortune of knowing precisely what I actually need.
Okay, so let's say you need a 500mi BEV. You may then be in 1% of the customers with the edge case requirements. What would any reasonable business say about that ?
 

dalton108

Well-known member
First Name
Dalton
Joined
Oct 17, 2020
Threads
132
Messages
3,975
Reaction score
7,919
Location
USA
Vehicles
‘24 FS/CB; ‘24 MX; ‘23 MS PLAID (Prior: ‘20-MY; ‘21-M3P) (Also: ‘14-FJ; ‘21-C8)
Occupation
Lawyer
Country flag
Okay, so let's say you need a 500mi BEV. You may then be in 1% of the customers with the edge case requirements. What would any reasonable business say about that ?
I’m pretty sure I’m not edge case when there are millions of people in my own town that have off-road vehicles and like to explore their state. I’ll just keep repeating it until somebody understands these words in English: There are parts in my state that I simply cannot get to AND return from with the range that we have in the CT.

It’s not a niche market. It’s stupefying to me how you can forget that this is the market and range that Tesla initially set out to address. And now, because they can’t (yet) do it and spin this as “300 miles is enough,” so many of you are just bamboozled/Jedi mind tricked into believing it’s true that it really makes me laugh.
 
Last edited:

cybercricket

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
659
Reaction score
798
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
I’m pretty sure I’m not edge case when there are millions of people in my own town we have off-road vehicles and like to explore their state. I’ll just keep repeating it until somebody understands these words in English. There are parts in my state that I simply cannot get to And return from with the range that we have in the CT.
Millions of people in your town are off-roading like there is no tomorrow ? Okay.

It’s not a niche market. It’s stupefying to me how you can forget that this is the market and range that Tesla initially set out to address. And now because they can’t (yet) do it and spin this as “300 miles is enough” so many of you are just bamboozled into accepting that that it really makes me laugh.
Let me help you understand this then. Tesla is not in the market of making toy vehicles. They consistently talk about sustainable transportation at scale and not the weekend fun. They did their analysis and decided it's not worth building a significantly more expensive/heavy vehicle variant upfront because absolute majority of their customer base aren't likely to buy it over a cheaper and sufficiently capable variant. That is not to say that they don't want a larger market, but they simply decided to optimize for the largest market segment first. It is possible that they will release other variants in the future iterations, but they already sort of went through this exercise with their Model S and Model X lineups. Most Americans are cheap and paranoid. Cheap comes first.
Sponsored

 
 








Top