⛔️ NO RESALE language REMOVED for Cybertruck sales agreement! ✏️ 📄

[cvalue13]

The responses to your post are clearly 'relevant', or you would've left them alone.

nah, it’s just because - I like in real life where decorum rules - in this forum I often don’t just let slide when someone is repeating irrelevant non-sequiturs with a view to confusing the issue at hand

Nobody here has said, or been confused about, the topics to which your comments appear to be taking exception

forum: “the order contract page on Tesla.com no longer has specific Cybertruck language with crazy no resale”

you: “nobody‘s bought a CyberTruck yet, and resellers are bad”

forum: *collective stare*

Sponsored

 

[ÆCIII]

nah, it’s just because - I like in real life where decorum rules - in this forum I often don’t just let slide when someone is repeating irrelevant non-sequiturs with a view to confusing the issue at hand

Nobody here has said, or been confused about, the topics to which your comments appear to be taking exception

forum: “the order contract page on Tesla.com no longer has specific Cybertruck language with crazy no resale”

you: “nobody‘s bought a CyberTruck yet, and resellers are bad”

forum: *collective stare*

I never said (all) 'resellers are bad'. I'm just for a waiting period to deter manipulative flipping and scalping. But why would you think that one process is so critically important? Are you or anyone you're associated with a reseller or car dealer? I'm genuinely curious.

Even if there were a 'collective stare', I wouldn't even notice it if my points were solid.

But how does painting that type of hypothetical picture, support any of your points?

- ÆCIII

 

[charliemagpie]

Headlines will surely flow...

"Heartless Tesla profits by refusing genuine resale requests"

"Man pleads to save his house, but Tesla refuses his profit-taking'.

Let the court cases begin!! Or let it peter out, overall customer delivery timeline is hardly dented.

A lot of BS red tape is not the Tesla way imo.

 

[rizvend]

That's a very different statement from the Cybertruck only section that existed before

It 's directly from the same Documentation on the website under my order. Go figure.

 

[ÆCIII]

Headlines will surely flow...

"Heartless Tesla profits by refusing genuine resale requests"

"Man pleads to save his house, but Tesla refuses his profit-taking'.

Let the court cases begin!! Or let it peter out, overall customer delivery timeline is hardly dented.

A lot of BS red tape is not the Tesla way imo.

If someone is a bad steward of their resources or puts themselves in a precarious financial position with their capital assets such as a house, they should not anticipate nor depend on profit schemes (of any kind) to reconcile their mistakes, and it's certainly not Tesla's fault. They should find honest ways of being sustainable with their contributions and resources they get in return.

Too much of this "woe is me the victim I've made myself become" and "it's someone else's fault that I cannot be truthful or find a genuine way to sustain" The human mind is blessed, if people will only have faith and believe in themselves, have patience for long-term (but real) solutions, and stop being selfishly resentful when quick fixes or get rich quick schemes don't pan out.

- ÆCIII

 

[cvalue13]

If someone is a bad steward of their resources or puts themselves in a precarious financial position with their capital assets such as a house, they should not anticipate nor depend on profit schemes (of any kind) to reconcile their mistakes, and it's certainly not Tesla's fault.

that wasn’t his point

 

[ÆCIII]

that wasn’t his point

He was implying that it would be an MSM headline, or one of the MSM's points. I was simply saying that people need to stop fueling the victim mentality that the MSM so loves to ignite.

But you're right it wasn't his main point in that it will likely not make that many 'dents'. Your point about my point of focus - taken.

- ÆCIII

 

[Eddyrelik]

They probably just removed it from the Model Y agreement as it was on that document that “leaked”. They’ll probably make a new CT agreement and have similar language.

 

[charliemagpie]

Just cannon fodder for MSM. Not much about right or wrong.

 

[Gurule92]

It 's directly from the same Documentation on the website under my order. Go figure.

Well, it's similar. One is a preorder agreement. But yes the no reseller section existed in the pre order agreement. But it's different from the section labeled Cybertruck only in the purchase agreement.

 

[hridge2020]

How bout a clause saying if you happen to total your vehicle and you wanted a replacement you wouldn't have to wait in line again.

 

[HaulingAss]

Regardless, any 'representative' sample means nothing. Each MVPA a buyer receives could be unique and the buyer is responsible for reading and acceptance of it's terms if they sign it.

Absolutely. What happened is that Tesla went live with the Cybertruck "no-flipping" clause embeded in the Purchase/Sale Agreement for all their models and someone higher up wondered why that clause was added to the contracts of all their customers when it's only relevant to the Cybertruck, a model that Tesla would be lucky to deliver much more than 1000 of this year.

I will bet dollars to donuts that clause is in all Cybertruck Purchase/Sale Agreements.

People who want to use the Cybertruck release to scalp end users of the Cybertruck can go weep in a dark corner somewhere. To them I say, get a productive job instead of trying to selfishly create profit, without adding any real value, by extending our already long waits.

 

[HaulingAss]

How bout a clause saying if you happen to total your vehicle and you wanted a replacement you wouldn't have to wait in line again.

That would be rewarding bad driving. If you total your Cybertruck, you have to go to the end of the line!

 

[scottyah]

Scalpers no scalping!

The preorders came at a time when scalpers were running rampant, all it took is a bot, free time, and a lack of human decency to make a quick buck. Concert-goers, kids wanting a PS5 or xbox, and the nearly the entire crypto currency market were all victims (not to mention TSLA short sellers in an additional layer of scalpiness).

To me it's pretty obvious that people who have 0 intention of keeping the Cybertruck should not be rewarded just because they could click a button first (perhaps an exclusion for Munro who will immediately tear it apart, but for science).

Anyone who buys one and decides it's not for them can sell it back to Tesla, they just have to trust they won't lose money unfairly in the exchange.

The nanny state becomes necessary when a bunch of inbreds prove that they need one

Sponsored