Gurule92
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2021
- Threads
- 201
- Messages
- 3,825
- Reaction score
- 7,374
- Location
- Colorado Springs
- Vehicles
- MYP
- Occupation
- "Cyber" stuff
We can YOLO. A little easier in CO with that $5k on top of the feds. (When it happens)there is no way around it
and this should have been clear to anyone once the pricing went live for either both Foundation trims, or the retail beast trim.
Though I do sometimes forget that the Tesla crowd hasn’t for some time paid as close attention to the credits as the rest of us have.
the Lightning crowd in particular, during first year production and while the new regime was being proposed/amended/passed, we’re forced to get agile or be left totally confused
But it’s settled law and process now
as for the suggestion that because of the credits the FS would depreciate more quickly because of this, however, is a bit unclear. except for those not paying attention, the FS AWD was always priced at an effective $27,500 more than A RETAIL AWD for someone who otherwise qualifies for the credit.
but the retail Beast never qualified, and the retail AWD wouldn’t qualify for anyone who didn’t qualify for the credit in the first place (due to income caps, etc.).
Meanwhile, when it comes to the AWD Foundation unit: someone who qualifies for the credit based on income, is already YOLO’ing financially to decide to buy a $100K highly depreciating BEV asset - especially in this interest environment.
Hell, they’re YOLO’ing enough to reach for a $79K highly depreciating asset.
Long story short: that no CT trim currently offered qualifies for the credit boils down to the following small bucket of relevance:
Those who qualify for the credit in the first place (based on income), considering an AWD model, and deciding between a regularly YOLO of $79K vs a hyper-YOLO of $100K.
I’d argue that *should* be a relatively small bucket (though never underestimate the American’s willingness to YOLO for a vehicle).
Sponsored