Echoing your point: Watch; of all people James Cameron the Avatar Movie director and 'professional' deep, deep sea explorer explain materials strengths and what to select when you need a structure vessel to not only 'survive' but sustain the capability of handling 2,343 lbs. per square inch when you 1 mile below the sea. [that's one ton per square inch].I think he gets solid credit for trying to inform the viewer without resorting to sensationalism and I respect that a lot. It's a question that I want answers to and I feel more informed after watching the video. The concern that rises to the top for me is fatigue over time, but I think I need to understand the problem more.
On a side note, I wonder if there are going to be aftermarket solutions that pop up for this issue, or is it even something that people worry about to be worth the expense?
Are you using a weight distribution hitch? I haven't seen that question yet but I would imagine that changes everything? Or maybe not? Can someone offer an explanation on how that might change the EE video analysis?His point #3 - Long time fatigue - has been my #1 concern with the design since before it was released. The real world catastrophic scenario I see is very real (pulling an airstream over washboard for 1000's of miles over time). It is basically a 5000lb jackhammer on the hitch. It will eventually fail - possibly after you left the dirt road and are cruising at 70mph.
Yes I do - was required on my prior truck (K2500 GM Suburban). And yeah, it really changes the dynamics. I've been on roads with my back two tires almost off the ground (truck+airstream resting on airstream tires and truck front tires). Not quite, but enough that the rear tires slipped on level ground when they dropped into a gulley.Are you using a weight distribution hitch? I haven't seen that question yet but I would imagine that changes everything? Or maybe not? Can someone offer an explanation on how that might change the EE video analysis?
And I love EE but they don't like Elon/Tesla.
Yup, that would be a significant quality of life improvement for charging with a trailer on the long trips, since the most charging stations at this time aren't setup for trailers. But it would have to work pretty good to be useful - apparently Lightning has that feature, and it's not working great.Aside from the mechanical, I'd like to see them integrate an auto hitch mode into the CT's autopark such that the truck could center the truck's hitch ball below the trailer hitch. The goal would be ease of hookup of trailers.
Of course there's a difference. He picked very simple numbers so people don't get confused. If, for instance, you had a trailer that was 5' back to the axle, and you were carrying a one pound weight on a weightless tower that was 14,000' tall, one G of stopping force would put 14,000 lb/ft of force on the trailer hitch. One pound. My god, think of the children, man!I think the physics there is a lot more complicated than what was presented.
For example, assuming a 3,000lb trailer, is there a difference in [downward] forces during braking between an 8,000lb steel plate versus a 10ft tall 8,000lb concrete ring ?
Is there a difference between the forces when the pivot point is 10ft away from the hitch versus 15ft away ?
And finally, what is the impact of the trailer brakes slowing down the trailer more than the towing vehicle ?
I’ve been watching this guys videos for years. He actually does a really good job breaking down the engineering of the hitch. He is actually a pretty big fan of Tesla engineering. tlrd of the video, unless towing at max capacity, in A configuration that no one would do, it’ll be fine. Also he brought up the regulations for UK where it says that towing hitches and connections must be made of steel. Could be why they haven’t released in the UK.Not getting my click lol. I’m not too worried about towing.
Hey Jack, have you considered offering your materials science expertise to the naive engineers at Tesla? You might be able to help them pick materials that will actually work without failing.So you have to pick your materials carefully. Is it geeking out?..not really. It is drilling down to what you really, really need the material and structure to do. A hitch will go thru millions of minor and 100's of major stress cycles. AND have to be also high strength to handle 5,000-15,000 lbs of loads. Both is needed.
It is easy to gloss over thinking is it not important.
Good point! And what if the earth flipped it's axis at the same time you were towing that 14,000 foot tall weightless tower with a pound on top! I know the Earth's axis doesn't flip very often, but it does happen, the forces would be unbearable, especially if that hitch had already towed a million miles over washboards. I don't think it could handle it.Of course there's a difference. He picked very simple numbers so people don't get confused. If, for instance, you had a trailer that was 5' back to the axle, and you were carrying a one pound weight on a weightless tower that was 14,000' tall, one G of stopping force would put 14,000 lb/ft of force on the trailer hitch. One pound. My god, think of the children, man!