CHC
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2020
- Threads
- 27
- Messages
- 204
- Reaction score
- 787
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Vehicles
- F150, Model X
I did. Confirmed.who confirmed?
Sponsored
I did. Confirmed.who confirmed?
Oh.. I do think it needs fixed 110v plugs too. But you don’t need 15 outlets in use while in motion.Less useful for powering a fridge in motion.
I really don't like this solution.
-Crissa
That is so perfect. Where the He!! did you find that?
The Book of Faces.That is so perfect. Where the He!! did you find that?
Please somebody send this to Elon or Franz. Truly think they'd laugh and enjoy it
The cartoon is nearly as old as this forum.Please somebody send this to Elon or Franz. Truly think they'd laugh and enjoy it
OMG, one more cable is required
Ok, let me throw some technicalities out here and rain on someone’s parade.
Let's not make this more complicated than it is:So now I am curious. Is the charge controller in the vehicle which basically takes as much power as it can from the power source. Or is the charge controller in the charger and the vehicle tells it how much to supply. I have installed 6 Tesla chargers and they are super simple compared to say a solar inverter which is handling a similar amount of power with similar power conversion. So it would be interesting to know which smarts are in the car vs charger. Obviously if it V2V charging, the smarts will need to be in the car. So would you literally just need a special wire with a Tesla connector on each end.
Nice, my 7 yo son would love this coloring book, I am going to visit a service station!
Or 240, but same thingcant teslas charge on 120v (which will be in the CT). this means nothing
That would be about the least innovative way they could do this, but I guess really it’s for emergency purposes. So maybe 20 or 30 miles of charge in an hour would be all that’s really needed.Let's not make this more complicated than it is:
Elon has already disclosed the Cybertruck will have 120V and 240V power outlets. Just plug a Mobile Connector into the 240V outlet and into the EV you want to charge. The Mobile Connector tells the car what type of outlet it's plugged into (based upon the type of outlet adapter plugged into the Mobile Connector) and the car limits it's current draw to the amount appropriate for that kind of outlet.
The car will further limit amperage if it detects too much voltage sag, too much heat at the charge port, or the Mobile connector tells it there is an overheat condition in the outlet or elsewhere in the Mobile connector.
It would be more efficient if there were a DC to DC charge capability but I've seen no indication of that.
I don't think it's about innovation, it's about value and how much extra the feature costs to add. And how much additional value would be added by not having to use the already existing Mobile Connector and 240V AC outlet, vs. whatever would be required of the internal electronics and software to enable a dedicated port to port DC charging system and having a dedicated cable only for this application, a cable that would likely cost almost as much as a Mobile Connector, which many already have and that is more useful for other purposes.That would be about the least innovative way they could do this, but I guess really it’s for emergency purposes. So maybe 20 or 30 miles of charge in an hour would be all that’s really needed.