cvalue13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Threads
- 74
- Messages
- 7,145
- Reaction score
- 13,750
- Location
- Austin, TX
- Vehicles
- F150L
- Occupation
- Fun-employed
to me, there is that limited nuance of classifying SUV’s in a way that does or does not capture the inbetweeners like the Model Y. But a concerted and compelling argument in this respect, probably does not include appeals to values that appear contrary to the intent of the law - such as “no hybrid should get more incentives than any BEV,” which is clearly contrary to the intent of the law. The law is clear that any hybrid with as little as 7kwh of battery capacity and satisfying the other thresholds should get more incentive than any BEV that doesn’t satisfy even one of the thresholds.Does anybody see any ambiguous language that can be used to reduce or eliminate incentives for hybrids, or to include all Model Y models? The only thing I could think of would have to do with how the government classifies SUVs.
Sponsored