2024 Cybertruck Official Specs Leaked?! 😱 - Udated With Compare/Analysis

[cvalue13]

2024 Cybertruck Specs:


Overall length: 18.6 feet (5.67 meters)
Overall width (no mirrors): 79.9 inches (2.03 meters)
Overall height (medium setting): (1.79 meters)
Wheelbase: 143 inches (3.63 meters)

Curb weights:

• 2 motor: 6,670 lbs (3,026 kg)
• 3 motor: 6,890 lbs (3,125 kg)

Tow rating: 11,000 lbs (4,989 kg)
Max tongue: 1,100 lbs (499 kg)
Bed length: 72.8 inches (1.85 meters)
Bed Width: 51 inches (1.30 meters)
Frunk volume: 7.1 cubic feet (0.20 cubic meters)
Weight capacity of trunk: 420 lbs (190 kg)

Headroom:

• Front: 41.6 inches (1.06 meters)
• Rear: 39 inches (0.99 meters)

Legroom:

• Front: 41 inches (1.04 meters)
• Rear: 40.9 inches (1.04 meters)

Shoulder room:

• Front: 63 inches (1.60 meters)
• Rear: 62 inches (1.57 meters)

Hip room:

• Front/Rear: 57.2 inches (1.45 meters)

No outlets in front, two outlet in rear 120v one 220v

EDIT TO ADD:

Have bolted up a compare (in heat map) of interior dimensions:

As suspected (by some) for a while, interior dimensions come in nearest to a Chevy Avalanche, but with width at hips (determining seat width) being comparable to a Toyota Tacoma - which explains the lack of 6th seat, but also portends a rather narrow rear seat that is "5 passengers" in name along the lines of a Tacoma (though CT's better shoulder width will help a touch).

EDIT TO ADD A 2ND TIME: ADDED MODEL Y AS TESLA CONSUMER REFERENCE

Next is a heat map that essentially demonstrates the design thesis of the Cybertruck:

• *nearly* full-sized BEV truck cargo area,
• *nearly* mid-sized footprint/agility (but an ~F150 wheelbase, mitigated by 4WS)
• somewhat *better* than mid-sized interior volume, at least in terms of rear seat legroom, but basically mid-sized seat width

EDIT TO ADD A 2ND TIME: ADDED THE HEAT MAP OF EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS (note Rivian height is a bit slippery to get nailed down, but height I view as really a nearly irrelevant stat for adaptive vehicles)

Sponsored

 

[cvalue13]

EDIT TO CLARIFY: TFL says this photo appears to have a label saying 2kW

but on further consideration, that’s no sensible. As would be “12kW”

What makes more sense is a label near the plug that says “120v” (and at bottom likely “120/220c”)

 

[Baldey]

nice, seems credible thanks.

 

[CHC]

Don’t believe it, weights are way off

 

[TyPope]

14-50 limited to 2 kWh kW? Seems low for a 14-50. 12 kWh kW seems more likely.

EDIT: Yes, I goofed. I was corrected. That's fair.

(Since I was corrected correctly, I'll toss this reminder out there: THEN is time related as in "Do this and THEN do that" where THAN is comparative as in "This is bigger THAN that.")

This public service bulletin brought to you by my Dad.... dang it.

 

[cvalue13]

Don’t believe it, weights are way off

they’re not off.

 

[C T Rick]

Pretty disappointed with the 72.8” bed length.
Wish the power outlets were higher capacity along with outlets in the frunk.
If this is accurate, could have bought a Lightning with similar to better specs.

Rick

 

[Cybertruck Tampa]

Don’t believe it, weights are way off

Pretty sure Elon said himself it’s around 7k lbs. Soooo 6,890k lbs isn’t “way off.”

 

[Baldey]

Don’t believe it, weights are way off

they are almost spot on to what i predicted. although there's not much difference between dual and tri.. i might have been wrong about two different battery pack sizes after all still, remains to be seen though.

 

[IJNYamato]

Interesting…

 

[jerhenderson]

we'll know more when we hear it from Elon.

 

[bfayer]

they are almost spot on to what i predicted. although there's not much difference between dual and tri.. i might have been wrong about two different battery pack sizes after all still, remains to be seen though.

They could initially offer the 300 mile battery, and add the 500 mile battery later when they have a better battery supply. So I don't think we need to assume the weight given means only one battery choice in the long run.

 

[Kahpernicus]

no midgate option, fake

 

[Baldey]

They could initially offer the 300 mile battery, and add the 500 mile battery later when they have a better battery supply. So I don't think we need to assume the weight given means only one battery choice in the long run.

in the long run, definitely.. but i really wanted the top specced truck on release, and to pick up a lower spec one two years later. Might have to switch that plan around, if thats the case.. Might be a better plan in the long run anyway

We will see based on pricing! And i will probably have to go with the highest range option, which if they both use the same battery will be the dual motor.

 

[Dazureus]

Less rear headroom and hip room than my current Model X? Growing kiddoes won't be happy. Then again, we also cram them into a Model Y so it will feel roomy by comparison.

Sponsored