Paul Scott
Well-known member
- First Name
- Paul
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2024
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 106
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV
- Vehicles
- 2016 S, 2019 X, 2024 Cybertruck
- Occupation
- IT Director
EV's being allowed to use the HOV lanes didn't cost tax payers money outside of the cost of issuing a sticker. It did encourage people to purchase EV's which reduces pollution. Doing away with HOV so more cars can drive in the lane doesn't reduce pollution because a lane or two isn't going to make a difference to traffic but getting rid of gas powered cars does make a difference. Las Vegas has a huge number of EV's and over the last 10 years as more are on the road we have had noticeably fewer days of bad air quality. Less bad air quality also correlates to a drop in health care costs over a persons life time. Lower childhood asthma rates as well. I drive an EV because it is better for the environment, it is fun to drive and overall has a lower cost of ownership. The only reason the federal government pushed this rule to get rid of allowing EV's to use HOV lanes was to "stick it to the libs". I doubt it will hurt EV sales, getting rid of the EV tax credit probably will hurt EV sales to some degree. Reducing clean air standards, rolling back CAFE standards all will serve to undo the work that has been done to clean the air which will make everyone sicker and cost everyone more. It is sad that is the nation we live in now.
Sponsored