OP
OP
Bkb13

Bkb13

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2023
Threads
19
Messages
324
Reaction score
860
Location
Austin
Vehicles
raptor
Occupation
Entrepreneur
Country flag
I bet there will be no more tri motors outside of the foundation orders this year. For dual motors, April or later sounds reasonable.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Jhodgesatmb

Well-known member
First Name
Jack
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Threads
68
Messages
5,158
Reaction score
7,403
Location
San Francisco Bay area
Website
www.arbor-studios.com
Vehicles
Tesla Model Y LR, Tesla Model 3 LR
Occupation
Retired AI researcher
Country flag
Thanks for the heads up! Same on mine. Blue "Start Designing" button on the Manage Reservation page for my reservation. RN1127443XX, in TX.

Now I get to test my resolve to be financially prudent and wait for the non-Foundation AWD that will qualify for the tax credit... or somehow justify 100K for AWD Foundation. With AWD Foundation estimated delivery Jan-Mar 2024, I'm just hoping non-Foundation will deliver summer-fall 2024... I don't know if I can wait until 2025...
Not me :-(
 

cvalue13

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2022
Threads
74
Messages
7,146
Reaction score
13,756
Location
Austin, TX
Vehicles
F150L
Occupation
Fun-employed
Country flag

awhehackeur

Well-known member
First Name
Whehack
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Threads
5
Messages
57
Reaction score
89
Location
San Fernando, CA
Vehicles
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport ES
Occupation
AS Engineer
Country flag
Is Tesla running short of motor or having a supply problem?

I believe the expensive TM version of CTs would be prioritized for production over the AWD version to recoup dev cost, but it looks like it is happening in the reverse order. Does this imply that AWD holders may get their CTs earlier than expected? Very odd!!!
 


Jhodgesatmb

Well-known member
First Name
Jack
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Threads
68
Messages
5,158
Reaction score
7,403
Location
San Francisco Bay area
Website
www.arbor-studios.com
Vehicles
Tesla Model Y LR, Tesla Model 3 LR
Occupation
Retired AI researcher
Country flag
Couldnā€™t quite wrap my mind around this and thinking outloud:

Letā€™s call the Model 3 ramp ā€˜normalā€™ speed

4 months in, ~2,400 Model 3s had been built (if I understand Bloombergā€™s tracker graphs correctly?)

Would 2,400 CTs by end of March seem really slow?
Yes, and here is why. If they hit 250 per week by January 1st, then at a Flat line in production they would build 3,000 Cybertrucks (250/week x 12) by the end of March (and that is with production starting in January and not now). Elon said (and Tesla has historically had) exponential growth, so over some span of time we can expect production to double. If they double every other month then in the first 2 months they will make about 2,000 Cybertrucks and in the third they would make another 2,000. That would be slow, because doubling every other month is slow.

More importantly, the wait is excruciating, and hearing of people getting theirs just makes it worse. Predicting slow growth doesnā€™t help at all.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Bkb13

Bkb13

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 23, 2023
Threads
19
Messages
324
Reaction score
860
Location
Austin
Vehicles
raptor
Occupation
Entrepreneur
Country flag
Is Tesla running short of motor or having a supply problem?

I believe the expensive TM version of CTs would be prioritized for production over the AWD version to recoup dev cost, but it looks like it is happening in the reverse order. Does this imply that AWD holders may get their CTs earlier than expected? Very odd!!!
Itā€™s speculated that there is a tri motor power train supply issue.
 

Misterbee

Member
First Name
Warren
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
21
Reaction score
33
Location
Los Angeles
Vehicles
Model Y + T@g teardrop, Toyota Camry
Occupation
Film Editor
Country flag

DumpsterFire

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 26, 2023
Threads
12
Messages
748
Reaction score
2,190
Location
Utah
Vehicles
Model 3
Occupation
Mouth Breather
Country flag
Wow! Just checked the web link (tesla.com - login) and was able to configure my order for a Foundation edition. I went Cyberbeast even though the delivery times are longer. $1k deposit.

I checked at least 4 times today. So it just happened!
Likewise last night! Was able to order the AWD. Res RN1127476XX in Utah

Maybe Iā€™m crack smoking but I thought it said deliver Dec-Janā€¦. Probably saw it incorrectly.
 
Last edited:


cvalue13

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2022
Threads
74
Messages
7,146
Reaction score
13,756
Location
Austin, TX
Vehicles
F150L
Occupation
Fun-employed
Country flag
That model 3 ramp was in 2018. I would think that theyā€™ve improved their ability to ramp up since then.
I hear that a lot

But I think thereā€™s a distinction to be made here.

To the extent theyā€™ve ā€œlearned how to rampā€ since 2018, those learnings will largely come in handy for things Tesla isnā€™t doing right now in this stage of the ramp.

In this early stage of the ramp, theyā€™re figuring out how to make an almost entirely novel production line get off the ground, building a vehicle using many entirely novel materials, tooling, parts, construction processes, etc.

These early ramp growing pains is what Musk referred to when he said he wants to ā€œtemper expectations" and that Tesla "dug our own grave with the Cybertruck."

"I do want to emphasize that there will be enormous challenges in reaching volume production with the Cybertruck and then making the Cybertruck cashflow positiveā€”this is simply normalā€

Until they dial in this new type of line, and novel vehicle build, anything theyā€™d ā€œlearned since 2018ā€ is more than offset by what theyā€™re learning for the first time, right now.

But after theyā€™ve dialed in this new line/vehicle, what theyā€™ve learned since 2018 will kick in.

Even then, though, people keep expecting ā€œwhat theyā€™ve learnedā€ to mean ā€œmore, faster, for customers.ā€

What theyā€™ve learned can instead just mean ā€œcheaper, smarter for Tesla corporate.ā€

Case in point: for the ~first time with the CT, theyā€™re not just doing a couple of hundred ā€œSignature Editionā€ builds in early ramp offered only to insiders for a premium, they appear to be doing a couple thousand ā€œFoundation Editionā€ units available to early res holders, which has all kinds of benefits to Tesla corporate during this bottom lef of the production S-curve.


And so, while @Jhodgesatmb ā€™s initial reply (now replaced) seemed pithy and irritated, it was a genuine question as to whether someone reasonably thinks that building a couple thousand units in this bottom leg of the s-curve is very slow, when Tesla is currently redefining how production lines and vehicles are constructed
 

cvalue13

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2022
Threads
74
Messages
7,146
Reaction score
13,756
Location
Austin, TX
Vehicles
F150L
Occupation
Fun-employed
Country flag
If they hit 250 per week by January 1st, then at a Flat line in production they would build 3,000 Cybertrucks (250/week x 12) by the end of March (and that is with production starting in January and not now).
yes ā€œif flat line productionā€ - but that is an unreasonable ā€œifā€


Elon said (and Tesla has historically had) exponential growth, so over some span of time we can expect production to double.
Elon has not said that. Nor has Tesla historically demonstrated that, ever

Elon has made very clear that not only will the CT ramp be an S-curve (which is not exponential, in this bottom leg), heā€™s also made clear that with the CT the bottom leg of that S-curve will be particularly acute given the CT context of a new production line and vehicle design and manufacturing.

To redundantly quote myself in back-to-back posts:

These early ramp growing pains is what Musk referred to when he said he wants to ā€œtemper expectations" and that Tesla "dug our own grave with the Cybertruck."

"I do want to emphasize that there will be enormous challenges in reaching volume production with the Cybertruck and then making the Cybertruck cashflow positiveā€”this is simply normalā€

Meanwhile, mitigating for Tesla corporate (and customers) this slow bottom leg of the S-curve is the entire point of this extended ā€œFoundation Editionā€ approach.

From both a financials and optics perspective, they are somewhat separating what they are currently building/selling right now from actually having ā€œstarted production.ā€


From an auto manufacturing perspective, these guys at GFTX are currently doing brain surgery on the moon.

From an auto corporate perspective, the management are meanwhile playing a marketing and financial balance sheet game of three shells and a pea. Theyā€™re exclaiming towards the public that production and deliveries have begun, while only ā€œproducingā€ and ā€œdeliveringā€ what help them avoid being treated by regulators and accountants as though either have really kicked off.

The unfortunate consequence is that corporateā€™s shell game leaves customers like you irritated.

While back in GFTX on the line floor, in this most critical and patience-demanding phase of the brain surgery on the moon, some super-fans are standing around them yelling into their ears ā€œfaster, faster, have you learned nothing!?ā€
 

Amuma

Well-known member
First Name
A
Joined
Jun 17, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
161
Reaction score
213
Location
Fl
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Country flag
Dual motor is January to March
trimotor is mid to late 2024

The question is, does this affect existing foundation orders, or will the new timelines only apply to new orders?

Newer confirmed orders. The system updates based on expected output at time you placed the order.
 

Jhodgesatmb

Well-known member
First Name
Jack
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Threads
68
Messages
5,158
Reaction score
7,403
Location
San Francisco Bay area
Website
www.arbor-studios.com
Vehicles
Tesla Model Y LR, Tesla Model 3 LR
Occupation
Retired AI researcher
Country flag
yes ā€œif flat line productionā€ - but that is an unreasonable ā€œifā€




Elon has not said that. Nor has Tesla historically demonstrated that, ever

Elon has made very clear that not only will the CT ramp be an S-curve (which is not exponential, in this bottom leg), heā€™s also made clear that with the CT the bottom leg of that S-curve will be particularly acute given the CT context of a new production line and vehicle design and manufacturing.

To redundantly quote myself in back-to-back posts:




Meanwhile, mitigating for Tesla corporate (and customers) this slow bottom leg of the S-curve is the entire point of this extended ā€œFoundation Editionā€ approach.

From both a financials and optics perspective, they are somewhat separating what they are currently building/selling right now from actually having ā€œstarted production.ā€


From an auto manufacturing perspective, these guys at GFTX are currently doing brain surgery on the moon.

From an auto corporate perspective, the management are meanwhile playing a marketing and financial balance sheet game of three shells and a pea. Theyā€™re exclaiming towards the public that production and deliveries have begun, while only ā€œproducingā€ and ā€œdeliveringā€ what help them avoid being treated by regulators and accountants as though either have really kicked off.

The unfortunate consequence is that corporateā€™s shell game leaves customers like you irritated.

While back in GFTX on the line floor, in this most critical and patience-demanding phase of the brain surgery on the moon, some super-fans are standing around them yelling into their ears ā€œfaster, faster, have you learned nothing!?ā€
He definitely said what you said - just last week. In the 2022 4th quarter earnings report he said this: ā€œI always try to downplay the start of production,ā€ Musk said. ā€œIt increases exponentially, but it is very slow at first.ā€.

https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/25/23571806/tesla-cybertruck-volume-production-delay-2024-q4-2022

So Elon definitely said that Cybertruck production would start slow but that it would ramp exponentially. I am not sure that the two statements are necessarily contradictory.

I only mentioned ā€˜flatā€™ production because, if they get to 250/week early in January, it would be 3,000 by the end of March, which is more than you said. Flat would not be slow growth, it would be no growth. I am not here to argue, no matter what you think; only to say that I think 2,500 in the first quarter would be slow and that I hope for more in a very, very selfish way.
 
Last edited:

dcrdanielr

Active member
First Name
Daniel
Joined
Dec 7, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
42
Reaction score
25
Location
Utah
Vehicles
Tesla Model Y
Occupation
Photographer
Country flag
Likewise last night! Was able to order the AWD. Res RN1127476XX in Utah

Maybe Iā€™m crack smoking but I thought it said deliver Dec-Janā€¦. Probably saw it incorrectly.
Bro how. Iā€™m in Utah and Iā€™m 112744. Ughhhhh
Sponsored

 
 




Top