I don't know why you Americans have to take everything to the extreme. Super sized hail, tornadoes and heat wave. And then all that at once.On a separate thread RE the glass, I’d come across this RE the Tesla patent for the CT
“In some embodiments, the multilayer glass stack has at most a, or about a, 10% chance of failure with an impact of, or of about, 1 J, 1.5 J, 2 J, 2.5 J, 3 J, 3.2 J, 3.5 J, 3.8, J, 3.9 J, 4 J, 4.5 J, 5 J or 6 J, or any range of values therebetween. In some embodiments, the multilayer glass stack has at most a, or about a, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% or 70% chance of failure, or any range of values therebetween, with an impact of, or of about, 3 J. “
Which is to say Tesla’s patent is expectedly over-broad in it’s possible “embodiments”
In response, Mother Nature is equally variable and “hold my beer”
“According to the International Association of Certified Home Inspectors (IACHI), the impact measured in joules, a unit of energy. IACHI says for instance, that 2-inch hailstone, falling at 72 mph, will carry 29.8 joules of impact energy…. The IACHI says a [baseball] sized hailstone would clock in at 162.7 joules, meaning a baseball sized hailstone impacting an object would do so with roughly the same amount of energy as the MLB’s fastest ever pitch. [A 19-inch hailstone in recorded in Vivian, S.D.]would carry around 193,897 joules of impact energy.”
which is all to say, when it comes to the question of how will the glass - or the SS - fare?
better than traditional materials, but also not up to a point does that matter
I wasn't surprised it destroyed the pad, just surprised how extensive the damage was. The dust plume said it all though. I helped with the cleanup so to speak, and have a peice of fondag as a souvenir.I think the launchpad destruction surprised Elon and his Space X engineering team.
I think you are right, but I am also not a chemist so I do not know how the patent office sees novelty in this area. If they are awarded the patent that would be something.yes of course
and for the same reasons, seeing the patent for info about Tesla’s discrete plans is only nominally helpful
the patent is actually broad enough that I can’t make out a single separate component that sounds novel: from numbers of layers, to composition, etc., it all sounds done before to someone that isn’t a glass manu expert
and, people may sometimes be underwhelmed to discover what little variance it takes to have a patent, and that patents need not describe a new outcome, only a slightly different way to get to the exact same outcome. In this respect, Tesla's glass itself may not do anything new.I think you are right, but I am also not a chemist so I do not know how the patent office sees novelty in this area. If they are awarded the patent that would be something.
I live in Texas where golf ball sized hail isn't that unusual, baseball is rare.. and softball happens... we have had bigger but once it gets beyond softball who cares..Cybertruck is certified (by me) against the worst hailstorm you can imagine. Even golf ball size hail ain't gonna do shit to 3mm of cold rolled stainless steel awesomeness. I'd even say the CT will fare way better than any other production vehicle, and as good as any armored vehicle. Just imagine a parking lot full of cars during a crazy hailstorm, the only vehicle unscathed is gonna be the CT.
Dare I say, "All hail CT?"
A 9mm at 25 yards has ~475 joules of energy for referenceOn a separate thread RE the glass, I’d come across this RE the Tesla patent for the CT
“In some embodiments, the multilayer glass stack has at most a, or about a, 10% chance of failure with an impact of, or of about, 1 J, 1.5 J, 2 J, 2.5 J, 3 J, 3.2 J, 3.5 J, 3.8, J, 3.9 J, 4 J, 4.5 J, 5 J or 6 J, or any range of values therebetween. In some embodiments, the multilayer glass stack has at most a, or about a, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% or 70% chance of failure, or any range of values therebetween, with an impact of, or of about, 3 J. “
Which is to say Tesla’s patent is expectedly over-broad in it’s possible “embodiments”
In response, Mother Nature is equally variable and “hold my beer”
“According to the International Association of Certified Home Inspectors (IACHI), the impact measured in joules, a unit of energy. IACHI says for instance, that 2-inch hailstone, falling at 72 mph, will carry 29.8 joules of impact energy…. The IACHI says a [baseball] sized hailstone would clock in at 162.7 joules, meaning a baseball sized hailstone impacting an object would do so with roughly the same amount of energy as the MLB’s fastest ever pitch. [A 19-inch hailstone in recorded in Vivian, S.D.]would carry around 193,897 joules of impact energy.”
which is all to say, when it comes to the question of how will the glass - or the SS - fare?
better than traditional materials, but also not up to a point does that matter
...Solar panels are not the fragile things of decades past.This is one of the many reasons I’ve argued against solar glass or tonneau
Ill make sure theres a smart solution for this shortly after receiving the first one
You caught me I definitely do not know anything about solar panel durability. These are just decorative packages stacked in one of several large empty offices. Its this new Feng Shui technique ive been trying out....Solar panels are not the fragile things of decades past.
-Crissa
...Then you should know they're pretty durable now a days? Like, I have different panels from about every five years for the last twenty and the newest of them are basically indestructible by hail.You caught me I definitely do not know anything about solar panel durability. These are just decorative packages stacked in one of several large empty offices. Its this new Feng Shui technique ive been trying out.