Sponsored

Cybertruck Range Extender

jahansolu

Well-known member
First Name
Jahan
Joined
Oct 17, 2024
Threads
43
Messages
365
Reaction score
913
Location
Vancouver
Vehicles
M3, Cybertruck
Country flag
I understand Tesla has given up on the Range Extender, however I do wonder if anyone has taken the truck completely apart - especially the truck bed area. The reason I ask is because now I’m curious to know if there ever was true intention of bringing the Range Extender to market or did they falsely advertise this feature.

In my opinion: if there is a port or connection somewhere under the trucks bed or by the high voltage port / connection, then we can indeed confirm that Tesla at least had the intention but the economics didn’t most likely make sense. However, if there is no port or connection for expansion (especially on the Foundation Series) it can pretty much be assumed they never had the intention of ever bringing this feature to market.

If the latter, this poses a lot of questions. Like what did they do with the deposits during that entire time? Yes, I know they refunded all the customers including myself but it does beg the question. Did they use that money as a loan from customer, interest free, then return?

If a port or connector or expansion does exist, could anything be done with it? Where is it located? Even the online service manual for Cybertruck foundation series never had any reference to such a port or connector or expansion. I have had a few devices in the past where expansion was promised but never delivered but it was easy to see where it could have been if it actually came to fruition.
Sponsored

 

mongo

Well-known member
Joined
May 27, 2024
Threads
5
Messages
4,520
Reaction score
5,497
Location
SE Michigan
Vehicles
Cyberbeast
Country flag
There is an unused port that was called out for an inductive charger. It may be too low current to support supercharging.
Tesla could have either replaced the penthouse on the pack or tied into the existing motor feeds for HV. Similarly, loop the coolant and communications through the extender.
 

Edphonse

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
94
Reaction score
150
Location
Washington
Vehicles
2021 Ford F-350 4x4 CC SRW 6.7L Powerstroke Diesel, 2024 Cyberbeast
Country flag
Autoline CT teardown shows the battery has an extended port, so it was intended to be added.

I personally (probably within the next year or so) plan on installing some programmable 800vdc power supplies (I'm thinking frunk right now) to be able to plug in roof top solar, my own batteries like eg4ll, or just a straight up gas generator for extended driving or towing. The parts I have picked out would be either a 300lb 14.5kw generator, a 500 lb 24kw generator, or 2x 200 lb 12kw generators. Current cost will be somewhere around 10k since I would be doing it myself. To put that in perspective, driving down the freeway not towing consumes about 30-35kw (120 kwh can usually let me drive about 3.5-4 hrs at 70 mph on a full charge). So a 24kw generator would mean that only 6-10 kw is taken from the battery resulting it a 12 (at 70 mph) hour drive time between recharge/fill up. Equivalent range of over 800 miles per charge/fill up.

Edit: it wasn't sandy munro I saw the range extender on, but autoline's caresoft
 
Last edited:

hemiarch

Well-known member
First Name
Ace
Joined
Jan 22, 2025
Threads
116
Messages
8,363
Reaction score
9,607
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
2024 foundation AWD, 2024 model x
Occupation
Trauma Surgeon
Country flag
Sandy munro CT teardown shows the battery has an extended port, so it was intended to be added.

I personally (probably within the next year or so) plan on installing some programmable 800vdc power supplies (I'm thinking frunk right now) to be able to plug in roof top solar, my own batteries like eg4ll, or just a straight up gas generator for extended driving or towing. The parts I have picked out would be either a 300lb 14.5kw generator, a 500 lb 24kw generator, or 2x 200 lb 12kw generators. Current cost will be somewhere around 10k since I would be doing it myself. To put that in perspective, driving down the freeway not towing consumes about 30-35kw (120 kwh can usually let me drive about 3.5-4 hrs at 70 mph on a full charge). So a 24kw generator would mean that only 6-10 kw is taken from the battery resulting it a 12 (at 70 mph) hour drive time between recharge/fill up. Equivalent range of over 800 miles per charge/fill up.
That’s awesome. Could you please share some more about what parts you have picked out and where/how much solar you plan to use? Will the truck let you charge it through that port while driving?
 


Edphonse

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
94
Reaction score
150
Location
Washington
Vehicles
2021 Ford F-350 4x4 CC SRW 6.7L Powerstroke Diesel, 2024 Cyberbeast
Country flag
That’s awesome. Could you please share some more about what parts you have picked out and where/how much solar you plan to use? Will the truck let you charge it through that port while driving?
It's the extended battery port. If it doesn't let you apply power while driving, the extended battery would be completely useless.

Currently I am not planning on solar, it is just an option. I am currently looking at westinghouse generators (if you know about nikola tesla and westinghouse, then it seems like a good fit) and some laboratory 800vdc power supplies I have my eye on.

And before people jump in saying it's not possible, I invite you to see a proof of concept from James Klafehn on YouTube and his trex trailer that he uses to make extended range batteries for his Teslas (S and X as I recall). Not quite the same set up (looks like he just tapped straight into the HVDC lines between the inverter and battery) but that's the nice thing about working with DC power. It is very easy to put things in parallel if you have the know how.

Edit:autocorrect picked wrong word
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
jahansolu

jahansolu

Well-known member
First Name
Jahan
Joined
Oct 17, 2024
Threads
43
Messages
365
Reaction score
913
Location
Vancouver
Vehicles
M3, Cybertruck
Country flag
@Edphonse - I’m glad to hear this feature was at least intended, sucks that it never came to fruition. I would be very keen and interested in seeing your process on how to potentially tap into and make our own make shift version of a range extender.
 

Jhodgesatmb

Well-known member
First Name
Jack
Joined
Dec 1, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
6,487
Reaction score
9,025
Location
San Francisco Bay area
Website
www.arbor-studios.com
Vehicles
Tesla Cybertruck FS AWD, Tesla Model Y LR
Occupation
Retired AI researcher
Country flag
I understand Tesla has given up on the Range Extender, however I do wonder if anyone has taken the truck completely apart - especially the truck bed area. The reason I ask is because now I’m curious to know if there ever was true intention of bringing the Range Extender to market or did they falsely advertise this feature.

In my opinion: if there is a port or connection somewhere under the trucks bed or by the high voltage port / connection, then we can indeed confirm that Tesla at least had the intention but the economics didn’t most likely make sense. However, if there is no port or connection for expansion (especially on the Foundation Series) it can pretty much be assumed they never had the intention of ever bringing this feature to market.

If the latter, this poses a lot of questions. Like what did they do with the deposits during that entire time? Yes, I know they refunded all the customers including myself but it does beg the question. Did they use that money as a loan from customer, interest free, then return?

If a port or connector or expansion does exist, could anything be done with it? Where is it located? Even the online service manual for Cybertruck foundation series never had any reference to such a port or connector or expansion. I have had a few devices in the past where expansion was promised but never delivered but it was easy to see where it could have been if it actually came to fruition.
Personally I don’t care. They aren’t moving forward so it is a moot point now (for me).
 


mongo

Well-known member
Joined
May 27, 2024
Threads
5
Messages
4,520
Reaction score
5,497
Location
SE Michigan
Vehicles
Cyberbeast
Country flag
Sandy munro CT teardown shows the battery has an extended port, so it was intended to be added.
Not so.
Sandy's tear down asked the question of what the extra port was for: answer per the service manual at the time was an inductive charger.

Caresoft as featured on Autoline mislabeled the second (and thus unused) rear motor port on an AWD as being for range extender.
 

Edphonse

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
94
Reaction score
150
Location
Washington
Vehicles
2021 Ford F-350 4x4 CC SRW 6.7L Powerstroke Diesel, 2024 Cyberbeast
Country flag
Not so.
Sandy's tear down asked the question of what the extra port was for: answer per the service manual at the time was an inductive charger.

Caresoft as featured on Autoline mislabeled the second (and thus unused) rear motor port on an AWD as being for range extender.
You are right, I thought I saw that on Sandy Munro. It was Autoline that I saw the inductive charge port along side the range extender.

Autoline has labeled at 20:35 in this video () as the range extender isn't actually the range extender per a draft procedure for tesla service centers that I found. So I am not sure which to believe. But it sounds like you found more proof that it is indeed not the range extended connection. Regardless, I am sure that inductive charger port would still be operable while in drive if there is no range extender connection.

Seems strange that Tesla would "sell" the range extender when there was no actual way to connect it to begin with.
 

SCTesla

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
2,470
Reaction score
3,685
Location
USA
Vehicles
22 Model S, 24 CT
Country flag
You are right, I thought I saw that on Sandy Munro. It was Autoline that I saw the inductive charge port along side the range extender.

Autoline has labeled at 20:35 in this video () as the range extender isn't actually the range extender per a draft procedure for tesla service centers that I found. So I am not sure which to believe. But it sounds like you found more proof that it is indeed not the range extended connection. Regardless, I am sure that inductive charger port would still be operable while in drive if there is no range extender connection.

Seems strange that Tesla would "sell" the range extender when there was no actual way to connect it to begin with.
They would have engineered a connection. It was a semi-permanent addition, so they could have figured that out.
 

PungoteagueDave

Well-known member
First Name
David
Joined
Mar 2, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
909
Reaction score
999
Location
Boynton Beach
Vehicles
‘25 Tesla Cybertruck, ‘26 Tesla MY Launch, ‘13 Porsche C4S, ‘26 BMW R1300 GSA
Occupation
retired
Country flag
You are right, I thought I saw that on Sandy Munro. It was Autoline that I saw the inductive charge port along side the range extender.

Autoline has labeled at 20:35 in this video () as the range extender isn't actually the range extender per a draft procedure for tesla service centers that I found. So I am not sure which to believe. But it sounds like you found more proof that it is indeed not the range extended connection. Regardless, I am sure that inductive charger port would still be operable while in drive if there is no range extender connection.

Seems strange that Tesla would "sell" the range extender when there was no actual way to connect it to begin with.
It is right up there with the whole fake battery swap charade.
Sponsored

 
 








Top