Deleted member 12560
Guest
Isn't every moving part on a vehicle a point of failure? Some fail sooner than others.the RWS is cool and all.. but it just screams POINT OF FAILURE to me. I guess it is TBD.
Sponsored
Isn't every moving part on a vehicle a point of failure? Some fail sooner than others.the RWS is cool and all.. but it just screams POINT OF FAILURE to me. I guess it is TBD.
I'll take that chance... parking my F350 long-bed in small parking lots suck a bucket of donkey... Well, it sucks. Or rather sucked. I have an F150 now. I CAN tell you though - backing into parking spots is your friend with long wheel bases. And that F-350 had the turning radius of an aircraft carrier. (The F-450 I had, on the other hand, with it's wide mono-beam front suspension would turn on a dime. I suppose a large turning diameter up front does that.)Yes, but now it is doubled.
Dont get me wrong, its cool and handy. I guess my perspective on the usefulness is skewed living in Texas.. our cities are just made for trucks haha.I'll take that chance... parking my F350 long-bed in small parking lots suck a bucket of donkey... Well, it sucks. Or rather sucked. I have an F150 now. I CAN tell you though - backing into parking spots is your friend with long wheel bases. And that F-350 had the turning radius of an aircraft carrier. (The F-450 I had, on the other hand, with it's wide mono-beam front suspension would turn on a dime. I suppose a large turning diameter up front does that.)
But, I really, really want 4-wheel steering for parking lots if nowhere else!
Oh, and why do Home Depot, Lowes, and Menards have the smallest parking spots? I mean, you are quite likely to find a large percentage of trucks in those lots and yet they are all small... Angled spots would be nice but you have idiots who pull through those and effectively face the wrong way. Sigh... just give me 4-wheel steering, please.
In truth it is more than doubled. For two failure events, the probability of neither occurring is the product of their individual failure probabilities. If, for instance, each axle has a probability of failure of 50% in a given time, the probability that neither will fail is (.5 x .5) or .25. Thus the probability that either one, or the other, or both will fail is (1 - .25) or 75%.Yes, but now it is doubled.
Keep in mind that it has a longer wheelbase than trucks the same length so it'll probably turn horribly without 4 wheel steering.. Like F-350 crew cab long bed bad.Dont get me wrong, its cool and handy. I guess my perspective on the usefulness is skewed living in Texas.. our cities are just made for trucks haha.
If its optional it wont be added to my build.
Have you ever had your steering go out on any vehicle? Barring accidents and alignment.Yes, but now it is doubled.
I am generally with you on keeping things as simple as possible. The stress and time lost on breakdowns hardly justify most added conveniences for me. I would definitely prefer the truck without air suspension. A lot of Range Rover owners spent a lot of time and money on it but some Lexus owners are very happy with it with minimal issues. I am not sure which one is CT closer to but I rather not have it on CT (I doubt I will have the option) but for rear wheel steering I would take the additional risk. A lot of GM owners that have used it for years love it and would want it again. And with my current lightning, every time I get out of my driveway, I have to cut into the oncoming traffic. On most parking lots, I have gotten the feel for parking an aircraft carrier and can make it work but in some situations, it can be really handy. If I lived in Texas, I probably would skip it.Dont get me wrong, its cool and handy. I guess my perspective on the usefulness is skewed living in Texas.. our cities are just made for trucks haha.
If its optional it wont be added to my build.
[/QUOTE]It looks like a Cyber Pontiac Aztec from this angle