Waiting for UAW shoe to drop?

PilotPete

Well-known member
First Name
Pete
Joined
May 8, 2023
Threads
5
Messages
641
Reaction score
1,559
Vehicles
Porsche, BMW
Occupation
Pilot
Country flag
Regarding the gap. I didn't look at past 100 years but in my life time, this is what I see:
D,

I don’t want another post removed because I said something that someone else construed as “political”, so I’ll say this carefully.

”Poverty”, “Middle Class” and “Upper Class” are generic terms without a universally accepted definition. As you change the numbers for those terms, you can adjust the charts to create all sorts of equity or inequity. According to the census bureau, in the 1960’s you were looking at 17-22% of the US population below what they defined as the poverty level. In 2019, it was 10.5%.
Sponsored

 

flowerlandfilms

Well-known member
First Name
Eryk
Joined
Dec 6, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
602
Reaction score
1,333
Location
Australia
Vehicles
Yamaha SRV-250
Occupation
Film Maker
Country flag
A CEO can easily be rewarded highly for improving "performance" by making the stock go up.
For examples, CEO ruthlessly sells off all the companies assets.
The stock goes up, CEO is hailed as a hero and leaves with a golden parachute.
Meanwhile the long term prospects of the company have been severely hampered and inevitably it goes bust.
How was the CEO helping that company to "perform"?
He wasn't, he was giving a short term boost to the stock and then buggering off, leaving the company and it's remaining shareholders holding the bag.
It's a mindset, which is taught at some business schools, that the shares of a company are it's product and you should do anything and everything to make the shares go up, to make the customers (that's the shareholders, not the actual customers of the company) happy.
It's braindead but if there is money to be made people will do it.
And it all comes as a result of confusing a companies "value" for a companies "worth".
And incentivising and compensating the boosting of the incorrect one.
 
OP
OP

Love2Cyber

Active member
First Name
Carl
Joined
Jan 19, 2020
Threads
3
Messages
40
Reaction score
41
Location
Sacramento
Vehicles
Model S, Model X, Cyber Tri-Motor
Country flag
A CEO can easily be rewarded highly for improving "performance" by making the stock go up.
For examples, CEO ruthlessly sells off all the companies assets.
The stock goes up, CEO is hailed as a hero and leaves with a golden parachute.
Meanwhile the long term prospects of the company have been severely hampered and inevitably it goes bust.
How was the CEO helping that company to "perform"?
He wasn't, he was giving a short term boost to the stock and then buggering off, leaving the company and it's remaining shareholders holding the bag.
It's a mindset, which is taught at some business schools, that the shares of a company are it's product and you should do anything and everything to make the shares go up, to make the customers (that's the shareholders, not the actual customers of the company) happy.
It's braindead but if there is money to be made people will do it.
And it all comes as a result of confusing a companies "value" for a companies "worth".
And incentivising and compensating the boosting of the incorrect one.
O...K... Understand what a Board of Directors is? Let me help you out... They decide on who the CEO is (btw - it is a he or a she...you seem to imply they are all male). The BOD is largely comprised of major shareholders who seek to improve the value of the company and their positions. No - not for the next 6 months - but for the long-term. They decide on the CEO's compensation structure, and they also influence and sign off on major policy positions - including things like divestitures and acquisitions. So no - unless the CEO owns the company, they won't be able to "ruthlessly sell" the company assets to manipulate stock prices.

Stupid me for responding to this...
 

flowerlandfilms

Well-known member
First Name
Eryk
Joined
Dec 6, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
602
Reaction score
1,333
Location
Australia
Vehicles
Yamaha SRV-250
Occupation
Film Maker
Country flag
O...K... Understand what a Board of Directors is? Let me help you out... They decide on who the CEO is (btw - it is a he or a she...you seem to imply they are all male). The BOD is largely comprised of major shareholders who seek to improve the value of the company and their positions. No - not for the next 6 months - but for the long-term. They decide on the CEO's compensation structure, and they also influence and sign off on major policy positions - including things like divestitures and acquisitions. So no - unless the CEO owns the company, they won't be able to "ruthlessly sell" the company assets to manipulate stock prices.

Stupid me for responding to this...
Unless the board also wants short term gains?
What I described is literally taught at business schools as optimum strategy.
Your incredulousness at the mere suggestion of the existence of short-termism is baffling.
 


 


Top