cvalue13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Threads
- 74
- Messages
- 7,146
- Reaction score
- 13,756
- Location
- Austin, TX
- Vehicles
- F150L
- Occupation
- Fun-employed
just to level-set some possibly incorrect assumptions here... That means it will be months before there is a public release. Tesla still have to crash test the final production vehicle with NITSA, they usually release to employees before general public. If my guesses are correct, we will be lucky to see it on the streets in publics hands before 2024. S00n?
FIRST:
NITSA doesnât crash-test these vehicles before retail sales.
Manufacturers crash test the vehicles, then submit the regulatory-required information to NITSA for certification.
at times, NITSA may later acquire and crash-test samples. But that is a post-sales confirmation / keep-em-honest process. NITSA generally only does this with high volume vehicles, where they get the best bang-for-buck. Even after public sale, many lower volume or luxury vehicles are never independently crash tested by NITSA.
SECOND:
while itâs already been said, to add: not only is Tesla past RC builds and weâre seeing now instead some MC builds, itâs not necessarily the case that the MCs need separate, extensive testing.
The testing of the vehicle performance (including crashworthiness) can be done primarily on the RCs. The RCs, once competed/validated, ARE the final CyberTruck**. They are all production parts, ultimately completed to production specs. The only difference is that they are somewhat completed by hand (mostly at the beginning, less so towards the end).
The MC builds are âmanufacturing confirmationâ units, used to confirm that the LINE can put them together as intended, to the same specs as the RCs were able to accomplish.
accordingly, while the MCs may still be put to various confirmation tests, like follow-up crashworthiness tests - this in theory wouldnât need to be as extensive. Theyâve done crash testing on numerous RCs at this point, and know the vehicle as intended performed sufficiently (or they wouldnât have moved to MC builds) - and follow-up testing would be if at all to confirm that the line-built MC units are similarly performing as expected. And if they donât, it means thereâs an issue with the line builds, not the vehicle as intended.
so, all in all, none of this is to say Tesla isnât still doing important work and there isnât still work to be done - but the post Iâm replying to would seem to have one believe that progress is further behind than it is.
**that said, getting the line / MCs dialed in isnât necessarily the easy or quick part. Challenges can arise ar this stage, regarding the line.
itâs the difference between hand building a piece of furniture, and next building essentially an automated robot that can build the furniture for itself.
Sponsored