rlhamil
Well-known member
- First Name
- Richard
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2020
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 126
- Reaction score
- 153
- Location
- Glen Burnie, Maryland
- Vehicles
- 2002 Trans Am WS6, 2007 PT Cruiser GT
- Occupation
- retired
Lol.... yeah big time. They fell in that trap hook line and sinker......This puts Ford’s Mach-E and the Cadillac LYRIQ in a really tough place. They were both following Tesla’s pricing up the hill joyfully.
Now they have to convince their customers that their slow charging Model Y competitor is suddenly $20k more expensive than the Model Y.
I’m sure this means they double down on lobbying for relaxing the incentive qualifications. Would not be surprised if the IRS discovers car-like SUVs now qualify.
Based on the earnings call id say you have quite some time to continue paying down debtsMy limit on the CT is prob around 80K depending on how many debts I can pay off before Telsa tells me mine is being built.
My goal it to finance it without having to sell too many shares of Tesla stock (I bought 5 shares today when my welfare check hit the bank).
My payment on the Diesel Pig is 1100 a month so another payment in that range is doable.
Yeah and wheels for the Y are better after market. I’ve seen perfect copies of the Turbine wheels but as 19’s so you don’t loose range, that’s likely what I’d do if buying a Y today.Wheels you can easily buy after purchase and swap. That leaves room for white interior and color options. Charging connectors don't count towards the cap, they are accessories so excluded. Tow hitch can be installed after purchase also.
7-seater with third row folded has the same cargo space as 5-seat, there is no loss.
So seats and wheels may be optional upgradesFINAL LANDED DUAL MOTOR: $62,322 with a 30% gross margin!
Oh you were planning on seats and wheels?????So seats and wheels may be optional upgrades
Lol sounds like you read my thread from a few months ago. We'll get a QM 4WD with 4WS, and maybe in a few years a DM RWD.I agree with the overall concepts you present here but I think your pricing is a little of date and doesn't take into account how much better of a truck even a single motor Cybertruck will be compared to a RWD ICE pickup. The traction and handling advantage will be huge and coupled with the lack of fragile paint, super strong glass, and very low ownership costs relative to ICE, I think people will do the "Tesla stretch". And new truck buyers have more money than you might guess. There are nearly 600 million people in N. America with an average annual GDP of nearly $60K per person. One percent of this market represents 6 million people.
My wife has a RWD Model 3 and the traction on difficult surfaces and handling while accelerating hard out of corners is absolutely unreal compared to any other RWD car I've driven. In other words, RWD is under-rated when it comes to electric vehicles without a big heavy engine and transmission up front. Overall, it's even better than a rear-engine RWD vehicle due to the central battery weight.
What I would really like to see is for Tesla to only have a two motor and a four motor Cybertruck, both available with ~300 miles or ~500 miles battery. And here's the kicker, the two motor does away with the differential because both motors are in the rear. This will have the effect of making the RWD better than an ICE truck with a locking rear differential. It would climb like no RWD has any business climbing, especially with a load in the bed, because each rear wheel would be 100% independently driven. It could also torque vector and it's a very balanced configuration that would also be ideal for towing. People who thought they needed four-wheel drive might be surprised that they don't. Because RWD trucks are, even when they have a limited slip differential, mostly one wheel drive when on very slippery surfaces.
It would also greatly simplify production, because the two motor could have the same rear drive unit as the four motor model and the two battery options could be the same whether they were for the two or four motor models. The two-motor version could be quite affordable, not much more than a single motor, because it wouldn't need a differential. So Tesla could offer four basic models with the combinations of two and four motors and ~300 and ~500 mile ranges. It never made sense that one needed to get the tri-motor to get the 500 miles of range.
FYI PM motors still produce eddy currents when rotated and electrically isolated, because they have a permanent magnetic field created by the permanent magnets. Unlike a induction motor that has a field controller that can be switched off leaving it with no magnetic field and much less rotational resistance. (There's still bearing losses, rotational mass etc)Sort of correct. A spinning PM motor produces a voltage. The faster the motor spins, the higher the voltage. If it's an open circuit (nowhere for the energy to go) nothing happens. If there is a path for current to flow there will be current. The current will be inversely proportional to path resistance. (voltage is fixed based on motor speed). If the path is a 10W light bulb, low current and low resistance ot turn the motor. IF you connect a 6000W resistive heater, there will be high current and the motor will be much harder to turn. If it's a dead short, lots of current and there will be A LOT of resistance to rotating the motor (results similar to slamming on the brakes).
Now there's a lot of complicated stuff going on with the inverter control. I don't want to get into here, but if we ignore the complicated stuff, if the PEAK voltage (not RMS) of the AC coming from the motor is greater than the DC voltage supplied to the inverter, current will flow into the battery. Again, this is oversimplified, there are complex things the inverter can do to affect the voltage coming from the motor, that can control this, but if the inverter isn't actively doing this, the motor will charge the battery if spinning at a speed that causes voltage greater than the battery DC voltage.
If the issue was just regen power, I'd think they'd just put a contactor between the inverter and the motor. Open circuit, no current, no regen power. I noticed on one of Munro Teardowns there is an explosive fuse between motor and inverter on the Model S. My guess, if you tow a model S and the car detects the uncontrolled regen into the battery, they blow the fuse. I have no evidence to back that up, just my educated guess.