What about vehicle to home or grid, better have a big pack unless Tesla remove the feature.Range is king. We have treaded over this territory enough times ... fast charge times 'are' important, but as @Ogre and @TBONO mentioned, the large the range the more useful the truck will be and the better the charging rate. Just imagine pulling up to a 1MW charger and being able to charge at that rate for even 10 minutes!
I'm buying Cybertruck for RV hauling, definitaly need long range.Less than one percent does any towing in either a ICE or EV. Business usually caters to the 99%.
They use a wet process for the anode and cathode so they won't encounter the same troubles as Tesla, should be the same as their other cells chemistry wise. Anyway if Panasonic is able to produce higher energy density cells earlier than Tesla that's good not a negative.Ahh, right.
Thanks. I had to drop from his Patreon because he was sharing some bigoted memes.
Anyhow, my point was there's no reason to think Panasonic won't have the same troubles Tesla did in making the 4680, and have to take time to learn how to apply the chemistry to a larger cell. See 8:30 in the video.
-Crissa
Lawyer language for future lawsuit.That's not true. The trimotor page displayed it the same way the single motor page displayed it.
https://images.app.goo.gl/V579ya1XRqTD6bCx7
That wasn't the only place 500+ was mentioned. And didn't always say "up to".
https://images.app.goo.gl/FHz3heD7iLeZZqSQ6
Tesla has sent mixed messages about this issue from the start, because stating "up to" a number gives a ceiling, adding the + afterwards makes it confusing because the + isn't defined.
Like the linked photo. That photo tells me I'll get at least 500 miles of range (assumed based on some level of epa standard...driving 55, not towing, not fully loaded, but under ideal circumstances I could expect at least 500 miles).
And then there were those gui pics that showed a 610 number. Some (not me) think that number was also an indication of range.
If you travel in Northern BC you still need lots of rangeWho needs a long range battery when a rapid charge battery is a better solution? It would be smaller and lighter.
Wish it was that simple.Who needs a long range battery when a rapid charge battery is a better solution? It would be smaller and lighter.
Who needs a long range battery when a rapid charge battery is a better solution? It would be smaller and lighter.
With a megawatt charger that Elon announced the charging times will really be accelerated.Who needs a long range battery when a rapid charge battery is a better solution? It would be smaller and lighter.
Tesla doesn’t support V2G and has been vocal about not doing it … so far.What about vehicle to home or grid, better have a big pack unless Tesla remove the feature.
The funny thing is, my point was fixated on driving a month without having to charge. After posting that I had calculated 15 extra per week... it should have been per day.In any case, that Solar Vault is for me the 'Game Charger' especially when in Outback Australia
We haven’t heard a peep about that for ages but it can’t hurt to hope. Game changer? That sounds big.The funny thing is, my point was fixated on driving a month without having to charge. After posting that I had calculated 15 extra per week... it should have been per day.
The 60 extra miles, should read 420 or whatever sun it gets. It is significant.