RVAC
Well-known member
Model S width without mirrors actually is 78.2", so Cybertruck will probably be 80"?Model S, 77.3 "
g![]()
Model S width without mirrors actually is 78.2", so Cybertruck will probably be 80"?Model S, 77.3 "
g![]()
You must be looking at the previous gen Model S width, the new one is wider.I googled model s dimensions, and it came up with 77.3...
Yes, if bigger, we can add the difference to the CT
The CT is 5% smaller... but where is it losing the 5% ? We have to wait and see.
So it got wider then? Truck was 79.8 or something before?Model S, 77.3 "
g![]()
It may be inaccurate, just using an online app ...So it got wider then? Truck was 79.8 or something before?
But longer, and far more utilitarian. That bed, a working tonneau. Rivian has a nice product, but vastly overpriced. They know it.I predict it will be the same width of an R1T.
Don't shoot the messenger. I'll just stop posting what's being sent to me lolololAmerica this week: ‘Hmm, the CT seems to be more like a Ranger than an F-150.’
CT Forum: ‘Quick, post a distorted photo of the CT raised up next to a sedan.’
You need amber markers for vehicles over 80' wide. Since there aren't any, recon this thing is 79 ish.Model S, 77.3 "
g![]()
Width wise that is true, R1T is 79" wide, but length of an R1T is closer to a mid size truck than a full size.The question for me isn’t the exterior footprint of the CT, but the resulting interior/cargo space and functionality.
The Rivian is an example of what can go wrong in truck design: the R1T manages somehow to produce a truck that is full-sized on the outside dimensions, but decidedly mid-sized in interior space and cargo room. That’s like the worst of both worlds.
I have every faith that Tesla will out-design Rivian for cargo/interior space, but the “pre-production beta” at investor day has me now wondering “but by how much?”
BINGO, that first sentence.The question for me isn’t the exterior footprint of the CT, but the resulting interior/cargo space and functionality.
The Rivian is an example of what can go wrong in truck design: the R1T manages somehow to produce a truck that is full-sized on the outside dimensions, but decidedly mid-sized in interior space and cargo room. That’s like the worst of both worlds.
I have every faith that Tesla will out-design Rivian for cargo/interior space, but the “pre-production beta” at investor day has me now wondering “but by how much?”