Darth abbott
Well-known member
I found this is a pretty positive test. Honestly especially at the 65 mph without towing. But even the towing numbers were pretty good I thought. If you're towing around a city at 55 to 60 65 mph you got a pretty usable truck. No is designed to do long distance towing.Didn't see this one posted anywhere yet. My takeaway is that weight is a drag or decrease on range of any vehicle whether it's in the vehicle or being pulled. I think recent towing tests are reminding us that weight (and aerodynamic drag) isn't pulled without energy cost, as expected.
What we're also seeing, is that the power and braking performance of the Cybertruck is very good even when towing heavier loads. I do agree that the Range Extender is likely a must-have when towing heavy loads frequently outside of ones local area. I would note when towing even heavy loads just around town (trailers with building materials to construction sites, etc.) the Cybertruck will be an awesome vehicle for that use case.
Just for kicks I did a calculation comparison for 1205 wh/mi (at 12¢ per kWH which is close to Florida rates charging at home) with gas prices at $3.00 per gallon, which revealed a 21 MPG equivalent based on cost. I don't think any other truck could pull a trailer like that so inexpensively, so there's that.
That's based on cheap electricity rates at home however, but supercharger rates are usually higher. If estimating an electricity rate of 20¢ per kWH at the supercharger (if not free), then the result is 12 MPG equivalent, which is still not bad. Of course for free supercharging one is really saving some money when towing.
If gas prices are more than $3.00 per gallon, towing with a Cybertruck has even more cost benefits, if the electricity cost remains the same. If the electricity costs go up of then of course the cost benefits are less. I also think they need more pull-thru stalls at superchargers from what I'm seeing so far.
- ÆCIII
Sponsored