cvalue13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Threads
- 74
- Messages
- 7,153
- Reaction score
- 13,769
- Location
- Austin, TX
- Vehicles
- F150L
- Occupation
- Fun-employed
this isn’t exactly rightUsing VIN information is useless as well. Just because a VIN is made, doesn't mean the car even started production.
VIN activation info isn’t perfect, but it’s by far the best and most reliable info we’ve got.
especially if you have a little help from your friends
history has shown that knowing how to interpret VIN activation trends is a pretty good indication of scale and directionality of production.
The limitations are (1) it’s forward looking, and (2) it tends to become increasingly more forward-looking at production ramps
but one can get a feel for how forward-looking it is at a given time, by cross-referencing to delivered VINs. The more delivered VINs the better, but a sample helps scale if eg VINS activated in week X are relevant to vehicles delivered either 2 weeks later, or 2 months later.
Bloomberg’s Model3 VIN tracker for four consecutive quarters, came closer than Wall Street quarterly forecasts, and twice came within 0.5 percent of Tesla’s actual quarterly reported production.
(note/ I have a good idea of why they were off by 5% and 2% in Q1 and Q2, respectively)
so, even if our VIN tracker is forward-looking by a ‘vague’ range of ‘between 2-4 weeks’, it’s wildly more informative than these half-cocked ideas that viewing transport lots for 2 different hours in a 7 day week is informative - especially because Tesla could hold hundreds of units inside GfTX (and has before).
Sponsored