CTSoFL
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2024
- Threads
- 18
- Messages
- 452
- Reaction score
- 643
- Location
- South Florida
- Vehicles
- 2024 AWD Foundation Series Cybertruck
The problem I have with the charts mentioned is the age of them and the cells they are attributed to.
Battery University charts have nothing to do with 2170 or even later than 2015 18650 cells. For sure not the new 4860 cells. It is generality about cells and education. Please all don't give credence to a fellow from sweden that bench tests in his garage and regurgitates 10 year old data.
Bottom line is read the new study from Tesla it came out last week. Use a car for 200k you won't have to worry about the battery at all. They pretty much say that. Trust the BMS. https://www.tesla.com/ns_videos/2023-tesla-impact-report.pdf
So I say we need more electrification. Not waiting 10 more years for studies on how good things are. When we propagate these ideas that to baby the battery to make sure it is good for...... What to stare at and say it is good? These ideas have very little when I look at 100k cars compared to mine. The range difference is less than 2 miles. So we are all stupid or some are and some aren't.
These ideas of charging to 50% move people away from EV's not to EV's. Why do I need to charge to 50% in my EV when I can fill up my gas car to full? Crickets....................
I have mentioned early I don't subscribe to the 50% rule and have more miles than most everyone here. Yet my range is beyond anyone left. Charge to 90% every day.
Use the truck folks. Don't fall for the 50% unless it really is convenient for ya.
Sponsored