dLux
Well-known member
- First Name
- Balazs
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2022
- Threads
- 18
- Messages
- 227
- Reaction score
- 300
- Location
- Florida, USA
- Vehicles
- CB 2024, M3 2025, Jaguar XK Conv. 2007
- Thread starter
- #1
Probably because there's two leads from Tesla saying conflicting things.Why awkward?
There must have been a law change recently, and Rivian was the first to get it through the new process. Tesla has had them in Model 3's since at least 2021, but couldn't turn them on in the US because of the silly laws here. Same with side camera instead of mirrors...If Rivian has them already, why should Tesla have an issue with US laws? Or do I miss something?
also: could it be newer CT have the capable lights, but older (FS series) not? And that is why the unclear answers?
That is confusing to me. Why wouldn't Tesla be able to issue an OTA last year for their cars with applicable hardware in a similar timeframe that Rivian was able to do it? Maybe Tesla only had the hardware but never did the software until recently.There must have been a law change recently, and Rivian was the first to get it through the new process. Tesla has had them in Model 3's since at least 2021, but couldn't turn them on in the US because of the silly laws here. Same with side camera instead of mirrors...
that is a stock lightshow, I am wondering if that is built in and the matrix HL just have to be activated?That is confusing to me. Why wouldn't Tesla be able to issue an OTA last year for their cars with applicable hardware in a similar timeframe that Rivian was able to do it? Maybe Tesla only had the hardware but never did the software until recently.
2023 Model Y matrix example where the owner can program the lights to display Tesla on a wall.
The Cybertruck currently does not have matrix headlights.Why awkward?