cvalue13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Threads
- 74
- Messages
- 7,153
- Reaction score
- 13,769
- Location
- Austin, TX
- Vehicles
- F150L
- Occupation
- Fun-employed
Look friend, I think the truck TAM is real big, and AFTER the S3XY it makes tons of sense for Tesla to get into it. (Plus it’s fun, and plays to Musk’s autistic-wants-to-be-cool-and-macho tick).May be true but depends on how much of the pie CT takes and what margins are, that could be healthy size footnote.
Q1 22 vs Q1 23 pickup sales:
![]()
BUT JUST IN CASE ANYONE INVESTING IS CONFUSED:
the data you are showing is for ALL of those OEM’s full-sized and OVER trucks: for example, for Ford, that ranges from e.g., standard consumer 1/2 ton F-150, to all fleet sales, and all the way to the F-750s. Same for all the other OEM’s there. Trucks in excess of the F150 size (or fleet included) accounts for >40% (in units) of Ford’s annual sales, and more than that in % in revenue.
Oe if we narrow the aperture and look only amongst the retail F-150s, Ford offers 8 trim levels, starting at $33,365.
Meanwhile-meanwhile, the Cybertruck being released on Nov 30 is 1.5 trims, in middle-of-pack in terms of 1/2 ton capabilities, back of pack for 1/2 ton interior size (which for 1/2 tons is maybe THE key feature - or else people buy F250s for stats), and MSRP isn’t yet known.
Now don’t get me wrong, I’m here because I think Tesla could be offering something real compelling to the retail 1/2 ton retail market, at the upper-middle price point.
But when it comes to CyberTruck TAM/SAM, in an $TSLA relevant thread, a post showing the “F-series” (and equiv) data for all OEMs retail+fleet, could be a bit disorienting!
Sponsored
Last edited: