That probably because some of Tesla’s other vehicles use battery and other components from china.. Cybertruck is not one of thoseThat federal credit is also almost certainly to drop sizably by the time real customers get these trucks next year. Tesla has admitted it on their own website with a warning about it.
Notoriously just repackaging content from threads on here as articles. Again no sources in social media'ing.
Exactly, but whatever. I'm not out there trying to be a social network star. I have never had twitter and never will. Let them fight for views. I got better things to do with my time!Well people are citing him as source now. Sawyer Merritt, farzhad, Sean Mitchell
A little skeevy imo
You say this continuously without source or even implied source. Like you're an authority. Kind of annoying tbh.there.
is.
no.
500mi.
version.
(for now)
so let's direct the maths outward from that assumption, if we're trying to divine weights, etc.
you're annoyance seems to spring only from some personal reluctance.You say this continuously without source or even implied source. Like you're an authority. Kind of annoying tbh.
No source, got it.you're annoyance seems to spring only from some personal reluctance.
that's on you, not me
and in any event, even if you don't want to be helped, doesn't mean others don't mind being helped
A 5500 lb (or less) Dual Motor CT with 3500 lb cargo capacity is great news.
Anything less than 6,000# will have an issue with businesses that want to take Schedule 179 depreciation. And I don’t think that’s GVWR, I think it’s a vehicle “that weighs 6,000# or more” if I recall. We got some financial peeps here that can speak to it better than I. But that’s what I remember.5500lbs (2500kg) sounds like it's on the light side. But with DM and a 3500lbs (1500kg) payload that would make it pretty fantastic. It's heading into ant territory, maybe those two have something in common afterall? ? lol.
Genuinely curious, does your understanding come from inference/speculation or do you have a definitive source (though possibly unable to disclose for understandable reasons) that drives the notion there will not be a 500Mi version at release? If the latter, what general direction can you give for those of us closely monitoring this one specific metric? 350Mi? 400Mi?you're annoyance seems to spring only from some personal reluctance.
that's on you, not me
and in any event, even if you don't want to be helped, doesn't mean others don't mind being helped
No source, got it.
it's not inference/speculationGenuinely curious, does your understanding come from inference/speculation or do you have a definitive source (though possibly unable to disclose for understandable reasons) that drives the notion there will not be a 500Mi version at release? If the latter, what general direction can you give for those of us closely monitoring this one specific metric? 350Mi? 400Mi?
So just made up.it's not inference/speculation
but I have allegiances I take seriously (and who lurk here - hi guys!)
Right now, it's Devine intervention that needed! We could go with 'divining rods' to get to the source!there.
is.
no.
500mi.
version.
(for now)
so let's direct the maths outward from that assumption, if we're trying to divine weights, etc.
Yeah, it's absolutely stupid of a tax credit. Probably has gotten a nonzero number of Americans killed for oversized SUVs doing jobs a smaller, more capable (and less top-heavy pedestrian crusher) would do cheaper.Anything less than 6,000# will have an issue with businesses that want to take Schedule 179 depreciation. And I don’t think that’s GVWR, I think it’s a vehicle “that weighs 6,000# or more” if I recall. We got some financial peeps here that can speak to it better than I. But that’s what I remember.