2024 Cybertruck Official Specs Leaked?! 😱 - Udated With Compare/Analysis

[Mushadd]

EDIT TO ADD:

Have bolted up a compare (in heat map) of interior dimensions:

As suspected (by some) for a while, interior dimensions come in nearest to a Chevy Avalanche, but with width at hips (determining seat width) being comparable to a Toyota Tacoma - which explains the lack of 6th seat, but also portends a rather narrow rear seat that is "5 passengers" in name along the lines of a Tacoma (though CT's better shoulder width will help a touch).

View attachment 28392


Next is a heat map that essentially demonstrates the design thesis of the Cybertruck:

• *nearly* full-sized BEV truck cargo area,
• *nearly* mid-sized footprint/agility (but an ~F150 wheelbase, mitigated by 4WS)
• somewhat *better* than mid-sized interior volume, at least in terms of rear seat legroom, but basically mid-sized seat width

View attachment 28395

Nice. Can you add a Hummer EV to the mix?

Sponsored

 

[Cybertruck 1974]

The Lightning maybe a better choice for some. The CyberTruck will be awesome but the Lightning frunk is super big- and useful. Plus there are plugs in the frunk.

It will come down to your use case.

But it's a Ford. Never again. ?

 

[TacoTuesday]

Where does the spare tire go?

 

[ModelC]

Pretty disappointed with the 72.8” bed length.
Wish the power outlets were higher capacity along with outlets in the frunk.
If this is accurate, could have bought a Lightning with similar to better specs.

Rick

You still have a fabulous opportunity to purchase the Lightning; plenty are sitting on lots across the Country. And the good news is you get your $100 back to put towards the undercoating package or paint protection package.

 

[TyPope]

EDIT TO ADD:

Have bolted up a compare (in heat map) of interior dimensions:

As suspected (by some) for a while, interior dimensions come in nearest to a Chevy Avalanche, but with width at hips (determining seat width) being comparable to a Toyota Tacoma - which explains the lack of 6th seat, but also portends a rather narrow rear seat that is "5 passengers" in name along the lines of a Tacoma (though CT's better shoulder width will help a touch).

View attachment 28392


Next is a heat map that essentially demonstrates the design thesis of the Cybertruck:

• *nearly* full-sized BEV truck cargo area,
• *nearly* mid-sized footprint/agility (but an ~F150 wheelbase, mitigated by 4WS)
• somewhat *better* than mid-sized interior volume, at least in terms of rear seat legroom, but basically mid-sized seat width

View attachment 28395

Wait a second... My Maverick seats 5!

Five, I tell ya!

 

[cvalue13]

Nice. Can you add a Hummer EV to the mix?

I *could* but is it ok if I just summarize: f’n massive and no cargo room?

jk, I’ll try and get around to that

I’ve had a stats sheet waiting around for plugging in the CT interior/exterior specs, but have no personal interest in the Hummer - I can see, though, that a full compare of BEV ‘trucks’ would technically want it

 

[Mushadd]

Where does the spare tire go?

Only place I can see it going without losing bed space is in the bed compartment. Same as a Ridgeline, tucked under the front half of the bed.

my wife had a Ridgeline and it was easily accessible as long as you didn’t have cargo in the bed.

 

[cvalue13]

Wait a second... My Maverick seats 5!

Five, I tell ya!

? see the footnote in second chart. I’m reflecting that some trucks “seat 5,” while other trucks seat 5

 

[intimidator]

But it's a Ford. Never again. ?

I really enjoy my Lightning. Towing the boat. Been great. Tailgates have been great (several crockpots / fryers going in the frunk works well). The frunk gets used all the time.

PS. Trying to tow the 7500lb boat/trailer with the Model Y wasn’t going to work. 8000 miles so far and the Lightning has been flawless. It will hold me until Tesla delivers my CT (when?!)

 

[bfayer]

If the CyberTruck i am offered when I get to top of the list is only 300 miles of range, that will be disappointing. I reserved the 500 mile variant. Anything less than 375-380 miles will be a bummer. Especially after waiting 5 years.

I agree in general. when I said 300 and 500, I should have said (around 300 or 500) I suspect the the initial range will be between 300 and 350. I don't see how they could release a truck with less range than a Model Y LR. The 500+ range version is going to have to be closer to 550 for people that tow to be seriously interested.

I guess we will find out.

 

[cvalue13]

Only place I can see it going without losing bed space is in the bed compartment. Same as a Ridgeline, tucked under the front half of the bed.

the photo of the inverters, *is* the front half of the bed (also where tonneau stores, air bottle, etc)

 

[TBONO]

But it's a Ford. Never again. ?

You get a couple lemons when you make millions and millions in are number one

Ford is no jaguar, but Tesla is no Toyota either

 

[TacoTuesday]

Only place I can see it going without losing bed space is in the bed compartment. Same as a Ridgeline, tucked under the front half of the bed.

Didn’t look big enough though

 

[Amuma]

they are almost spot on to what i predicted. although there's not much difference between dual and tri.. i might have been wrong about two different battery pack sizes after all ? still, remains to be seen though.

From a reliable source I was told Tesla will limit the range on the non performance. But you can upgrade later to the extended range if you want to keep the costs as low as possible all while limiting sku count.

 

[samroy92]

Bed outlets appear to have a 2kW label

Am I blind?? Where is the label

Sponsored