LeoIsRad
Member
- First Name
- Leo
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2020
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 67
- Location
- Angleton TX
- Vehicles
- Cybertruck
- Occupation
- Pipefitter
That’s where you fucked up homie
You brought a Chevy…….
You brought a Chevy…….
Sponsored
I hope he does come close to his “promises”….I am prepared to bail if the tri-motor isn’t as promised. But you are taking my comment out of context. Elon can do what he wants with the Cybertruck specs, of course, but it is not his call to say what kind of range we want or need. And god damn him for even trying. And Elon has much bigger problems to deal with than ‘me’ bailing if he welches on his promises.
In a [small] way you are right. I have held off on buying a BEV for years waiting for one that could get at least 400 real miles per charge. I have not (and do not intend to) trailered often because my SUV really isn’t designed for it and, while in the workforce, I really didn’t have large amounts of time to do it comfortably. But having taken our MY on the interstate last winter I realized that I don’t ‘want’ to spend an extra 2 hours per day on the road just to charge at every available supercharger. In the summer it would be ok because I wouldn’t feel compelled to reach the next supercharger with at least 20-25% SOC and so I can charge a little less frequently. Driving from SF to LA only takes an extra hour and that is ok.With the way you're looking at it, it's a wonder you have any interest in EVs at all. If you need to tow long-distances, and don't want to charge along the way, why don't you get a gas or diesel tow rig? You're bellyaching about something you have complete control over.
Why do you even consider yourself an EV enthusiast? Does anyone make an EV that's good enough for your needs? It doesn't sound like it.
I think with the Rivians Cd of 0.30 and efficient motors proven with recent data that Tesla will have a hard time beating them by any significant amount.As we wait for 'real world' figures or EPA and so on, are you thinking any particular battery pack size and if so what's your rough in of consumption?
Could the TRI/QUAD run a 175 kWh pack and deliver a hypothetical 3.1 miles/kWh?
It would SMASH the competition if it this was the case.
Edit: On reflection, and reading Elon notes beyond 2019, l might be too heavy handed on that pack size. Something about carrying around batteries and a ~330 mile range. A salute to the environ_mental CT.
There is literally nothing amazing about the fact that you and I have different charging requirements and charging experiences. That is completely expected, not amazing.What is amazing is that you do not share my charging experiences and have similar requirements.
Huh? Of course I care that what gets delivered matches what I was sold!Clearly you do not care whether what someone ‘sells’ you is what they actually deliver. I do.
If it were ’any’ other car maker I would agree, and if it were ‘any’ other car maker I would not have waited around for almost 4 years because I would know, for sure, that what you are saying is what will come to be.you’ve always sort of taken the position that the 2019 unveil specs were each and every ‘promised’
That position by no means do I think is unfair or unreasonable, but it is just one of several available positions
and by now it’s fairly clear that promises or not, they’re not all going to be met
and yes, top spec range I think is amongst them
We agree about that (the nonsense part).There is literally nothing amazing about the fact that you and I have different charging requirements and charging experiences. That is completely expected, not amazing.
Huh? Of course I care that what gets delivered matches what I was sold!
Where did you get the odd idea that I don't?
A long time ago, I learned that when someone starts talking nonsense, there is something more going on there. There is always a reason why someone talks nonsense. That's not to say the reason can be easily identified.
I'm glad that Tesla gives us a 'heads up' as to what they are developing, before it is fully developed. It helps me understand where a company's product roadmap is going at an early stage. If the finished product needs to be changed, in order to adapt it to learnings along the way, I want them to adapt it, not blindly stick to the anticipated product specs so people didn't say "But, you promised!"If it were ’any’ other car maker I would agree, and if it were ‘any’ other car maker I would not have waited around for almost 4 years because I would know, for sure, that what you are saying is what will come to be.
This is where you lose me. Are you trying to equate Cybertrucks anticipated EPA mixed drive cycle range, that was announced at the reveal, with the range at a certain highway speed at a certain temperature? Because that's not what the anticipated range ever meant. It's the range in mixed driving, with all the variables defined by the EPA.Anyway, if you have decided that 330 miles of range at 60% normal range (about 200 miles), and 55 mph on the highway in 65 degree temperatures is fine, then good for you. It’s just not going to impress a lot of others.
It’s all perspective and details. If they do 330 miles at 55 mph in 65 degree weather using 8 rechargeable D cells, I’d be very impressed! I believe most people would be too.Anyway, if you have decided that 330 miles of range at 60% normal range (about 200 miles), and 55 mph on the highway in 65 degree temperatures is fine, then good for you. It’s just not going to impress a lot of others.
Or it might be a nearly fifteen year old car that's been discontinued and needs a complete pack rebuild and they quoted him a price that's way over market for even the specialty care, because that shop doesn't do that sort of work.That’s where you fucked up homie
You brought a Chevy…….
What do you expect the range will be for the tri-motor?and by now it’s fairly clear that promises or not, they’re not all going to be met
and yes, top spec range I think is amongst them
What do you expect the range will be for the tri-motor?